Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union: a comprehensive legal analysis (Section III. Bodies of the Union; Section IV. Budget of the union; Part two. Customs Union. Functioning of the Customs Union) The paper is a logical continuation of a series of works devoted to the study of legal loopholes in the Union Treaty. The authors give their own comments to the sections and paragraphs of interstate legal instrument. The definition of the term «Eurasian functionary/Eurasian employee» is formulated.

Cara reset printer canon mp287 tanpa software engineer. K&N RU-4730 Universal Clamp-On Air Filter Universal Air Filters / Universal Clamp-On Air Filter 5.0 out of 5 stars 4 Customer Reviews. In Stock & Ready to Ship! Free Ground Shipping! QTY Find a Dealer. Product Overview. Designed to increase horsepower and acceleration.

Of The opinions of foreign and domestic scholars about the nature of supranational institutions are given. Skunk anansie black traffic rar download torrent. The author’s interpretation of the term «Court of the Eurasian Economic Union. Court of EAEC/Confederation» is elaborated. The article focuses on the political, legal and economic developments within the Post-Soviet area including the processes of the Eurasian integration and its implications for the EU-Russian relations. The authors analyze the EU and Russia`s policies towards the Post-Soviet space including dynamics of the Post-Soviet politics, Eurasian integration and its institutions, EU Eastern Partnership and European Neighborhood Policy. The Agreement on the Eurasian Economic Union between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan and Association Agreements between the EU and Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova are analyzed. In conclusions the article outlines the prospects for the development of the EU-Russian relations regarding the Post-Soviet international politics and current Ukrainian crisis.

This article is devoted to the analysis of criminal investigations conducted by the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in respect of crimes committed in Ukraine, namely the legal jurisdictional basis of these investigations. The author exposes to the debate the principles of criminal jurisdiction, which lay the foundation of investigations, and distinguishes between the principle of universality and the principle of protection. The main criteria that enable to distinguish between these principles are considered and own conclusions are drawn. Keywords: foreign judgment, recognition and enforcement, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Republic of Kazakhstan. Work bibliographic list 1.

Sulejmenov M. Doklad na mezhdunarodnoj konferencii: «Uregulirovanie investicionnyh sporov s uchastiem gosudarstv s perehodnoj jekonomikoj» 13–15 nojabrja 2009 g., g. Moskva (v ramkah nauchnogo proekta, provodimogo pri podderzhke nauchnogo fonda «Fol'ksvagen» (Germanija) «Pravo inostrannyh investicij v Azerbajdzhane, Kazahstane i Rossii: balans interesov v stranah s perehodnoj jekonomikoj»). Chernichenko S. Vopros o sootnoshenii mezhdunarodnogo i vnutrigosudarstvennogo prava kak pravovyh sistem (razmyshlenie po povodu nekotoryh knig kolleg). — Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija i pravo: vzgljad v XXI vek. Materialy konferencii v chest' zasluzhennogo dejatelja nauki Rossijskoj Federacii, doktora juridicheskih nauk, professora kafedry mezhdunarodnogo prava juridicheskogo fakul'teta Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Ljudmily Nikiforovny Galenskoj / Pod red.

— SPb., 2009. The article examines the content of the international law principle of self-determination in the context of three ideas that define the essence of the state: sovereignty, common will and human rights.

The author concludes that the idea of general will should not be ignored in determining the content of this principle; some arguments in support of this conclusion are presented. The author concludes that the general will should not be influenced by the third countries which are not involved in the common good forming its ontological basis; the problem of illegal interference in the formation of the general will is considered. The author concludes that the general will is excluded from the international legal regulation; at the same time third states have an interest in establishing the fact of formation and expression of the general will. International standards of referendums are considered in this context as containing a reference to the evidence of blameless of the general will.